Predictive role of red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio combined mean platelet volume in patients with microscopic polyangiitis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the role of red blood cell distribution width (RDW)-to-platelet ratio (RPR) and mean platelet volume (MPV) in evaluating the disease activity of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 73 newly diagnosed MPA patients and 57 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The hematologic and biochemical indexes of two groups were assessed. The RPR was calculated as the ratio of RDW and platelet counts, and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was used to evaluate the disease activity. RESULTS: Compared with the healthy controls, RPR and RDW were significantly increased, and MPV was significantly decreased in MPA patients. In the MPA group, RPR was positively correlated with BVAS (p = 0.032), but negatively correlated with lymphocyte, hemoglobin, and complement 3 (all p < 0.05). MPV was negatively correlated with white blood cell (p = 0.045). Patients with BVAS > 15 had significantly higher RPR than patients with BVAS ≤ 15 (p = 0.011). A cut-off level of 0.066 for RPR had 47.9% sensitivity and 90.4% specificity in predicting MPA, and the combination of RPR and MPV had 75.3% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity in differentiating MPA patients from healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that RPR may be a potential marker of diagnosis and disease activity in newly diagnosed MPA patients. Additionally, a higher predictive value in monitoring and evaluation of MPA was found when RPR and MPV were combined.

Ferric citrate for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia and anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia and anemia, which are common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD), can independently contribute to cardiovascular events. Several previous studies have found that the iron-based phosphate binder, ferric citrate (FC), could be beneficial to both hyperphosphatemia and anemia. METHODS: Relevant literature from PUBMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT) and MEDLINE databases were searched up to 21 February 2022, in order to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy, safety and economic benefits of ferric citrate treatment in CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia and anemia. The meta-analysis was conducted independently by two reviewers using the RevMan software (version 5.3). RESULTS: In total, this study included 16 randomized clinical trials (RCT) involving 1754 participants. The meta-analysis showed that ferric citrate could significantly reduce the serum phosphorus in CKD patients compared to the placebo control groups (MD -1.76 mg/dL, 95% CI (-2.78, -0.75); p = 0.0007). In contrast, the difference between ferric citrate treatment and active controls, such as non-iron-based phosphate binders, sevelamer, calcium carbonate, lanthanum carbonate and sodium ferrous citrate, was not statistically significant (MD - 0.09 mg/dL, 95% CI (-0.35, 0.17); p = 0.51). However, ferric citrate could effectively improve hemoglobin levels when compared to the active drug (MD 0.43 g/dL, 95% CI (0.04, 0.82); p = 0.03) and placebo groups (MD 0.39 g/dL, 95% CI (0.04, 0.73); p = 0.03). According to eight studies, ferric citrate was found to be cost-effective treatment in comparison to control drugs. Most of the adverse events (AE) following ferric citrate treatment were mild at most. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our review suggests that iron-based phosphate binder, ferric citrate is an effective and safe treatment option for CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia and anemia. More importantly, this alternative treatment may also less expensive. Nevertheless, more scientific studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio: a potential novel predictor for acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit.

Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are considered as surrogate inflammatory indexes. Previous studies indicated that NLR was associated with the development of septic acute kidney injury (AKI). The objective of the present study was to explore the value of MLR and NLR in the occurrence of AKI in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The clinical details of adult patients (n = 1500) who were admitted to the ICU from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively examined. AKI was diagnosed according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The development of AKI was the main outcome, and the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Overall, 615 (41%) patients were diagnosed with AKI. Both MLR and NLR were positively correlated with AKI incidence (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the risk value of MLR for the occurrence of AKI was nearly three-fold higher than NLR (OR = 3.904, 95% CI: 1.623‒9.391 vs. OR = 1.161, 95% CI: 1.135‒1.187, p < 0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MLR and NLR in the prediction of AKI incidence were 0.899 (95% CI: 0.881‒0.917) and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.755‒0.804) (all p < 0.001), with cutoff values of 0.693 and 12.4. However, the AUC of MLR and NLR in the prediction of in-hospital mortality was 0.583 (95% CI: 0.546‒0.620, p < 0.001) and 0.564 (95% CI: 0.528‒0.601, p = 0.001). MLR, an inexpensive and widely available parameter, is a reliable biomarker in predicting the occurrence of AKI in ICU patients.

Microparticles from Hyperphosphatemia-Stimulated Endothelial Cells Promote Vascular Calcification Through Astrocyte-Elevated Gene-1.

Endothelial microparticles (EMPs) can be released in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Plasma concentration of high inorganic phosphate (HP) is considered as a decisive determinant of vascular calcification in CKD. We therefore explored the role of HP-induced EMPs (HP-EMPs) in the vascular calcification and its potential mechanism. We observed the shape of HP-EMPs captured by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) dynamically changed from rare dots, rosettes, to semicircle or circle. Our results demonstrated that HP-EMPs could directly promote VSMC calcification, or accelerate HP-induced calcification through signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3)/bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) signaling pathway. AEG-1 activity was increased through HP-EMPs-induced VSMC calcification, in arteries from uremic rats, or from uremic rats treated with HP-EMPs. AEG-1 deficiency blocked, whereas AEG-1 overexpression exacerbated, the calcium deposition of VSMCs. AEG-1, a target of miR-153-3p, could be suppressed by agomiR-153-3p. Notably, VSMC-specific enhance of miR-153-3p by tail vein injection of aptamer-agomiR-153-3p decreased calcium deposition in both uremia rats treated with HP-EMPs or not. HP-EMPs could directly induce VSMCs calcification and accelerate Pi-induced calcification, and AEG-1 may act as crucial regulator of HP-EMPs-induced vascular calcification. This study sheds light on the therapeutic agents that influence HP-EMPs production or AEG-1 activity, which may be of benefit to treat vascular calcification.

Causes and predictors of mortality from lupus nephritis in Southern Hunan, China.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to explore the causes and predictors of mortality in a cohort of LN with LN in southern Hunan, China. METHODS: We analyzed 236 patients with biopsy-proven LN during 2010-2018. Demographic data, laboratory data, SLEDAI scores, treatment strategies, and comorbidity were collected. Cox regression analysis was carried out to determine the independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The patients had mean disease duration of 67.9 ± 28.2 months. Class IV LN was the predominant biopsy class within the cohort (38.1%). After 1 year therapy, the majority of patients achieved complete remission (72.9%) and 44 (18.6%) patients achieved partial remission. The 5- and 10-years survival rates for our cohort were 94.4 and 85.2%, respectively. There were 18 deaths (7.6%), of which the main causes were infection (50%) alone and cardiovascular diseases (27.8%). Independent predictors of mortality in our cohort were: platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) [hazard ratio (HR) 5.910; confidence interval (CI) 1.253-27.875], onset age (HR 1.090; CI 1.035-1.147), and SLEDAI scores (HR 1.258; CI 1.068-1.482). CONCLUSION: We firstly revealed that PNR might be a promising predictor of mortality and reported the causes and prognostic predictors of mortality in LN from southern Hunan, China.

Using iron-based phosphate binders in phosphate reduction and anemia improvement in patients receiving dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: A study was conducted to determine whether iron-based phosphate binders (IBPBs) need to be preferred for hyperphosphatemia and anemia management in patients on dialysis. METHODS: For this meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IBPBs in decreasing phosphate and correcting anemia in dialysis patients. RESULTS: Nineteen trials comprising 4719 participants were included. Compared with placebo, serum phosphate decreased significantly after treatment with ferric citrate (FC), fermagate (one study), and SBR759 (one study). Hemoglobin increased significantly after treatment with FC and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21). In addition, FC and PA21 reduced serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and increased ferritin and transferrin saturation, but SBR759 did not. Compared with active treatment, the non-inferiority of IBPBs in reducing serum phosphate and iPTH was demonstrated. FC significantly improved serum hemoglobin and iron-related parameters and decreased the use of intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, whereas PA21 did not increase serum hemoglobin level. The incidences of infection and hospitalization were similar between the two groups, with FC having a higher risk of diarrhea than the placebo and active treatments. CONCLUSION: FC was associated with the control of hyperphosphatemia and the improvement of anemia. However, PA21 did not show superiority for alleviating anemia compared with the active treatment. Other IBPBs, such as fermagate and SBR759, remained poorly understood due to the limited number of studies. Further trials are required to assess the effect of IBPBs on the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Effect of L-carnitine supplementation on renal anemia in patients on hemodialysis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: L-carnitine is an amino acid derivative that is thought to be helpful for treating renal anemia in hemodialysis patients. However, the mechanism remains to be fully elucidated. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a meta-analysis for investigating the effect of L-carnitine in the treatment of renal anemia in participants receiving hemodialysis. RESULTS: A total of 18 eligible trials with 1090 participants were included in this study. L-carnitine can significantly increase plasma free L-carnitine levels (mean difference [MD]: 140.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 102.22-178.85; P < 0.00001), decrease the erythropoietin responsiveness index (ERI; MD: -2.72, 95% CI -3.20 to -2.24; P < 0.00001) and the required erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) doses (MD: -1.70, 95% CI -2.04 to -1.36; P < 0.00001). However, the use of L-carnitine was not associated with a higher hemoglobin level (MD: 0.18, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.55; P = 0.35) and hematocrit level (MD: 1.07, 95% CI -0.73 to 2.87; P = 0.24). In subgroup analyses, the effects of L-carnitine supplementation on renal anemia in patients on hemodialysis were independent of the treatment duration and intervention routes. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicated that L-carnitine therapy significantly increased plasma L-carnitine concentrations, improved the response to ESA, decreased the required ESA doses in patients receiving hemodialysis, and maintained hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. L-carnitine supplementation should be supported in hemodialysis patients. However, the relationship between L-carnitine treatment and long-term outcomes is still unclear. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to verify our findings.

The therapeutic effect of plasma exchange on ANCA-associated vasculitis: A meta-analysis.

AIMS: The therapeutic effect of plasma exchange (PLEX) combined with conventional treatment in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared PLEX added to conventional therapy with conventional therapy only in active AAV. RESULTS: 19 studies were included for the meta-analysis. Compared with the conventional therapy group, the PLEX group had a significantly reduced risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at 3 months (odds ratio (OR) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.16 - 0.66, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%), and the ANCA titerwas also decreased (OR = 40.99, 95% Cl = 23.56 - 58.43, p < 0.00001, I2 = 42%). The plasma and non-plasma exchange groups had no substantial differences in terms of short- and long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, ESRD risk at 12 months and 5 years, remission rate, serum creatine levels, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: PLEX therapy was not associated with favorable long-term outcomes, although the results showed benefits in the incidence of ESRD rate at 3 months and ANCA titers in patients with AAV. No advantage of PLEX added to conventional therapy on mortality and complete remission was observed in patients with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Further high-quality multicenter RCTs with a high number of participants are required to assess the potential efficacy of PLEX in active AAV.

A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background/aim: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparison and its timing between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Materials and methods: The RCTs of MMF versus CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov. After screening relevant RCTs, two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Relative risk (RR) was used to report dichotomous data, while mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to report continuous outcomes. The analysis was conducted using the random-effect model due to the expected heterogeneity among different studies. Four subgroups were allocated to compare MMF with CNI as maintenance immunosuppression: (1) after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, (2) after 6 months of CNI-based therapy, (3) after 12 months of CNI-based therapy, and (4) in recipients with allograft dysfunction. Results: Twelve RCTs with 950 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis presented the following results upon comparison between MMF and CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: (1) MMF significantly improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not only in the comparison performed after 3, 6, or 12 months of CNI-based therapy but also in the comparison of recipients with allograft dysfunction, (2) MMF may increase the risk of acute rejection in the comparison performed after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, but no increase was noted in the comparison performed after 6 or 12 months of CNI- based therapy. Conclusion: Our present meta-analysis suggested that MMF followed at least 6 months of CNI-based therapy is an effective maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for kidney transplant recipients to improve renal function but not increase rejection.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Reduces the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Moderate Renal Impairment Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary angiography (PCI/CA). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of RIPC on CIN in patients undergoing PCI/CA. The main outcomes of interest were the incidence of CIN 48-72 h after CA, the levels of serum creatinine, cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), mortality, and requirement of hemodialysis and rehospitalization. The analysis was conducted using the random-effect model due to the expected heterogeneity among different studies. RESULTS: In total, 16 trials covering 2,048 patients were identified. By assessing the methodological quality of the included studies through the Coch-rane risk of bias, we found that of the 16 RCTs, 3 had a low risk of bias, 6 a high, and 7 an unclear risk. The application of RIPC decreased the incidence of CIN (relative risk, RR, 0.50, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.39-0.65; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that RIPC decreased the incidence of CIN in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75; p < 0.001) but not in patients with eGRF ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.35-1.94; p = 0.66) at baseline. Furthermore, the increase in serum creatinine was significantly lower in patients with RIPC compared to control patients (standardized mean difference -1.41, 95% CI -2.46 to -0.35; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Based on 16 RCTs, this meta-analysis shows that RIPC can reduce the risk of CIN in patients with moderate renal impairment undergoing PCI/CA. However, this needs to be confirmed by further high-quality evidence.

Etelcalcetide versus placebo for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients receiving hemodialysis, and a meta-analysis was performed using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched studies published on PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase to collect RCTs comparing etelcalcetide with placebo for the treatment of SHPT. Unpublished studies and information were also searched in ClinicalTrials. RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 1,268 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, etelcalcetide contributed to more participants who achieved ≥ 30% reduction in parathyroid hormone (PTH) (relative risk (RR) 8.64; 95% CI, 6.66 to 11.19; p < 0.00001) and a PTH level of ≤ 300 pg/mL (RR 11.80; 95% CI, 8.15 to 17.08; p < 0.00001) as well as an increase in the incidence of hypocalcemia (RR 18.76; 95% CI, 4.55 to 77.26, p < 0.0001), nausea (RR 1.79; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.70; p = 0.006), or vomiting (RR 1.82; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.85; p = 0.008). Etelcalcetide reduced serum phosphate (mean difference (MD) -7.28; 95% CI, -8.82 to -5.74; p < 0.00001), calcium phosphorus product (MD -14.48; 95% CI, -15.07 to -13.88; p < 0.00001), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (MD -24.80; 95% CI, -28.91 to -20.68) levels compared with the placebo. CONCLUSION: Etelcalcetide can effectively control serum PTH and disorder of mineral metabolism but with more side effects than placebo. Further studies comparing etelcalcetide with other medication treatments for SHPT will be needed to evaluate if etelcalcetide might be a valuable choice with less pill burden for patients with SHPT receiving hemodialysis.